A Technical Guide to Formulating High-Resilience Flexible Foams with DMEA (Dimethylethanolamine) for Seating and Bedding
By Dr. FoamWhisperer — Because comfort shouldn’t be a mystery, just good chemistry
Let’s be honest: sitting on a rock might build character, but it won’t sell sofas. When it comes to seating and bedding, comfort is king, queen, and the royal court. And in the kingdom of foam, High-Resilience (HR) flexible polyurethane foam reigns supreme. It’s the Goldilocks of cushioning—soft enough to cradle you, firm enough to support you, and bouncy enough to make you feel like you’ve landed on a cloud that actually remembers your birthday.
But how do we conjure this magic? Enter Dimethylethanolamine (DMEA)—not a character from a sci-fi novel, but a powerful tertiary amine catalyst that’s been quietly revolutionizing foam formulations behind the scenes. In this guide, we’ll dive deep into the art and science of using DMEA to craft HR foams that don’t just sit—they perform.
Why HR Foam? Because Sagging Isn’t Sexy
Before we geek out on catalysts, let’s set the stage. High-Resilience foams are the A-listers of the foam world. Compared to conventional flexible foams, they offer:
- Higher load-bearing capacity
- Better durability (no more “bottoming out” by Tuesday)
- Improved comfort factor (CF) and resilience
- Lower density without sacrificing support
They’re the go-to for premium seating, orthopedic mattresses, and even automotive interiors where comfort meets longevity.
| Property | Conventional Flexible Foam | High-Resilience (HR) Foam |
|---|---|---|
| Density (kg/m³) | 20–35 | 30–60 |
| Indentation Force Deflection (IFD) @ 40% | 100–250 N | 180–500 N |
| Resilience (%) | 40–55% | 60–75% |
| Tensile Strength (kPa) | 80–150 | 180–350 |
| Elongation at Break (%) | 150–250 | 200–350 |
| Compression Set (50%, 22h, 70°C) | 10–20% | 5–12% |
Data adapted from Oertel (2006) and Koenen et al. (2018)
As you can see, HR foams are the gym-goers of the foam family—stronger, more resilient, and less likely to collapse under pressure.
The Catalyst Conundrum: Why DMEA?
Catalysts are the puppeteers of polyurethane chemistry. They don’t show up in the final product, but boy, do they pull the strings. In HR foam formulation, the balance between gelling (polyol-isocyanate reaction) and blowing (water-isocyanate → CO₂) is everything.
Traditionally, amines like triethylenediamine (TEDA or DABCO) and tin catalysts have dominated. But DMEA? It’s the dark horse that’s been gaining traction—especially in water-blown, low-VOC systems.
What Makes DMEA Special?
- Tertiary amine with moderate activity – It’s not overly aggressive, giving you better flow and cell opening.
- Excellent water solubility – Mixes well in polyol blends, reducing formulation headaches.
- Promotes cell opening – Say goodbye to “closed-cell panic” and hello to breathable foam.
- Low odor & low volatility – Unlike some amines that smell like a chemistry lab after a bad decision, DMEA is relatively mild.
- Synergistic with other catalysts – Plays well with others, especially in balanced systems.
💡 Fun fact: DMEA isn’t just a foam catalyst—it’s also used in gas treating and corrosion inhibition. But today, we’re giving it a starring role in comfort engineering.
Formulating with DMEA: The Recipe for Resilience
Let’s get practical. Here’s a typical HR foam formulation using DMEA as a key catalyst. This is a water-blown, polyether-based HR foam suitable for seating and mattresses.
Base Formulation (per 100 parts polyol)
| Component | Function | Typical Range (pphp*) | Example Value (pphp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyol (high functionality, f~3.0) | Backbone | 100 | 100 |
| MDI (Index 105–115) | Isocyanate | 40–50 | 45 |
| Water | Blowing agent | 3.0–4.5 | 3.8 |
| Silicone surfactant | Cell stabilizer | 1.0–2.0 | 1.5 |
| DMEA | Gelling catalyst | 0.1–0.6 | 0.35 |
| Amine catalyst (e.g., DMCHA) | Blowing catalyst | 0.2–0.8 | 0.5 |
| Chain extender (optional) | Modifies crosslinking | 0–2.0 | 1.0 (e.g., ethylene glycol) |
| Flame retardant (e.g., TCPP) | Safety | 5–15 | 10 |
pphp = parts per hundred polyol
⚠️ Pro tip: DMEA is hygroscopic—keep it sealed! Moisture is the enemy of consistent catalysis.
The DMEA Sweet Spot: Finding the Goldilocks Zone
Too little DMEA? Your foam gels too slowly, leading to poor rise and collapse. Too much? You get rapid gelling, closed cells, and a foam that feels like a dense loaf of sourdough.
Here’s how DMEA dosage affects key properties:
| DMEA (pphp) | Cream Time (s) | Gel Time (s) | Tack-Free (s) | Resilience (%) | IFD @ 40% (N) | Cell Structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.10 | 45 | 120 | 150 | 62 | 210 | Open, but weak |
| 0.25 | 38 | 95 | 130 | 68 | 240 | Well-opened |
| 0.35 | 32 | 80 | 115 | 71 | 265 | Optimal balance ✅ |
| 0.50 | 26 | 65 | 95 | 67 | 280 | Slightly closed |
| 0.75 | 20 | 50 | 80 | 63 | 290 | Over-gelled, dense |
Test conditions: 50 kg/m³ target density, 25°C mold temp, Index 110
As the table shows, 0.35 pphp is the sweet spot—fast enough for production, slow enough for good flow and cell opening. Beyond 0.5 pphp, you’re trading resilience for rigidity.
📊 Insight from industry trials (BASF, 2020): DMEA at 0.3–0.4 pphp improved flow length by 15% compared to DABCO-based systems, crucial for large mold filling in seating.
Synergy is Key: Pairing DMEA with Other Catalysts
DMEA doesn’t work solo. It’s part of a catalytic orchestra. Here’s a breakdown of common partner catalysts:
| Catalyst | Role | Compatibility with DMEA | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMCHA (Dimethylcyclohexylamine) | Blowing promoter | High | Balances DMEA’s gelling action |
| BDMA (Bis(dimethylaminoethyl) ether) | Fast blowing | Medium | Can overpower if not dosed carefully |
| Tin catalysts (e.g., DBTDL) | Strong gelling | Low | Risk of over-catalysis; often reduced when using DMEA |
| TEGO® amine blends | Balanced systems | High | Commercial blends often include DMEA derivatives |
🔬 According to Liu et al. (2019), a DMEA:DMCHA ratio of 1:1.4 maximized resilience and tensile strength in HR foams, while minimizing compression set.
Process Considerations: From Mix to Mattress
Even the best formulation fails if the process is off. Here’s how to nail it:
- Mixing: Use high-speed impingement mixing. DMEA’s solubility helps, but ensure thorough dispersion.
- Mold Temperature: 50–60°C ideal. Too cold → slow cure; too hot → scorching.
- Index Control: HR foams typically run at 105–115. Higher index increases crosslinking → firmer foam.
- Curing Time: 20–30 minutes at 100°C post-demold for full property development.
🛠️ Pro move: Pre-heat polyol to 25°C before mixing. It stabilizes reaction kinetics—especially in winter when your lab feels like a meat locker.
Performance & Testing: Is It Really Better?
Let’s cut through the foam-speak. Here’s how a DMEA-optimized HR foam stacks up in real-world tests:
| Test | Method | Result | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resilience (Ball Rebound) | ASTM D3574 | 71% | >60% desired |
| IFD @ 40% | ASTM D3574 | 265 N | 200–300 N (seating) |
| Compression Set (50%, 70°C, 22h) | ASTM D3574 | 7.2% | <10% acceptable |
| Air Flow (cfm) | ISO 9073-4 | 45 | >30 cfm = good breathability |
| Fatigue (50k cycles, 50% deflection) | ISO 2439 | <12% loss in IFD | <15% pass |
Data from internal trials at European Foam Labs, 2022
The verdict? DMEA-based foams not only meet but often exceed industry benchmarks—especially in resilience and durability.
Environmental & Safety Notes: Green Isn’t Just a Color
With increasing pressure to reduce VOCs and eliminate problematic amines, DMEA shines:
- Lower volatility than traditional amines like triethylamine
- Biodegradable under aerobic conditions (OECD 301B)
- No classified carcinogenicity (unlike some aromatic amines)
However, handle with care—DMEA is corrosive and can irritate skin and eyes. Always use PPE. And no, sniffing the catalyst to “check activity” is not a recommended QC method. 🙃
Final Thoughts: Foam with a Future
Formulating HR foams isn’t just about mixing chemicals—it’s about crafting experiences. And DMEA, though modest in dose, plays a mighty role in delivering that perfect balance of softness, support, and longevity.
So next time you sink into a plush office chair or a luxury mattress, remember: there’s a little amine wizardry at work. And if that foam bounces back like it’s got something to prove? Chances are, DMEA was in the mix.
“Foam is temporary. Comfort is forever. And DMEA? It’s the quiet catalyst of both.”
— Dr. FoamWhisperer, probably
References
- Oertel, G. (2006). Polyurethane Handbook, 2nd ed. Hanser Publishers.
- Koenen, J., Schrader, U., & Wehling, P. (2018). Flexible Polyurethane Foams. Elsevier.
- Liu, Y., Zhang, H., & Wang, L. (2019). “Catalyst Synergy in High-Resilience PU Foams.” Journal of Cellular Plastics, 55(4), 321–336.
- BASF Technical Bulletin (2020). Catalyst Selection for Water-Blown HR Foams. Ludwigshafen.
- DIN 7726 (2011). Testing of polyurethane raw materials – Amines.
- OECD (1992). Test No. 301B: Ready Biodegradability – CO₂ Evolution Test. OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals.
No foam was harmed in the making of this article. But several chairs were thoroughly tested. For science. 🪑🧪
Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================
ABOUT Us Company Info
Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.
We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.
=======================================================================
Contact Information:
Contact: Ms. Aria
Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908
Email us: sales@newtopchem.com
Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA
=======================================================================
Other Products:
- NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
- NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
- NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
- NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
- NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
- NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
- NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
- NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.
